GCC 4.5 should get link-time optimization which will hopefully help binary size a lot. ultimately though, i still find myself reaching for C, for the ease of binding to other languages and the smaller size. i still like to keep my code C++ compatible and run it through the C++ compiler occasionally though, just because it’s much stricter on typing.
Feeds
104649 items (96858 unread) in 19 feeds
Friends
(992 unread)
-
2 Star
(79 unread)
-
John Carrino
(12 unread)
-
Comments for Josh the Outspoken
(273 unread)
-
Josh (34 unread)
-
Planet Matt
(594 unread)
Build
(67517 unread)
-
MAKE Magazine
(20223 unread)
-
Instructables.com
(34656 unread)
-
Hack A Day
(4913 unread)
-
Toolmonger
(7725 unread)
Heads
(712 unread)
-
Exploration Through Example
-
Paul Graham: Unofficial RSS Feed (112 unread)
-
Stevey's Blog Rants
(33 unread)
-
Joel on Software (205 unread)
-
Gibson Blog
(239 unread)
-
Adventures in Bloggery (123 unread)
News
(27430 unread)
-
Slashdot (25098 unread)
-
Economist.com Global Agenda (1412 unread)
-
Ruby Inside
(920 unread)
fun
(207 unread)
-
Templar, Arizona
(207 unread)
Items by nobody
Comments for Josh the Outspoken
-
Comment on Torn over the C++ question by nobody
Posted: December 14th, 2009, 4:09pm MST by nobody