great choice! 
Feeds
104649 items (96858 unread) in 19 feeds
Friends
(992 unread)
-
2 Star
(79 unread)
-
John Carrino
(12 unread)
-
Comments for Josh the Outspoken
(273 unread)
-
Josh (34 unread)
-
Planet Matt
(594 unread)
Build
(67517 unread)
-
MAKE Magazine
(20223 unread)
-
Instructables.com
(34656 unread)
-
Hack A Day
(4913 unread)
-
Toolmonger
(7725 unread)
Heads
(712 unread)
-
Exploration Through Example
-
Paul Graham: Unofficial RSS Feed (112 unread)
-
Stevey's Blog Rants
(33 unread)
-
Joel on Software (205 unread)
-
Gibson Blog
(239 unread)
-
Adventures in Bloggery (123 unread)
News
(27430 unread)
-
Slashdot (25098 unread)
-
Economist.com Global Agenda (1412 unread)
-
Ruby Inside
(920 unread)
fun
(207 unread)
-
Templar, Arizona
(207 unread)
Items by Alejandro M.
Comments for Josh the Outspoken
-
Comment on Torn over the C++ question by Alejandro M.
Posted: December 3rd, 2009, 7:47am MST by Alejandro M.
-
Comment on Porting upb to C++? by Alejandro M.
Posted: December 1st, 2009, 10:59am MST by Alejandro M.
assuming the generated C code is good, why not?
thanks! -
Comment on Porting upb to C++? by Alejandro M.
Posted: December 1st, 2009, 10:02am MST by Alejandro M.
@Josh: Hi! You mentioned my reason… I work on a CXX-free embedded controller. Moving from ASN.1 to protocol buffer at IPC (hate threads) level thanks to your awesome upb and I was starting to write the Lua bindings to finish the migration integrating the http front-end and some Lua based helpers running inside the controller. So porting ucb to C++ because will hit me… badly
… your implementation is great!. I understand porting it to C++ will save you some lines… but maybe some refactoring can help to reduce the complexity without having to switch to C++? you can do all the bindings you aim keeping it in C… with all it’s current benefits -
Comment on Porting upb to C++? by Alejandro M.
Posted: December 1st, 2009, 7:49am MST by Alejandro M.
please don’t :’(