BuffaloFeeds » Slashdot » How a Virginia Lawfirm Outpaces the MPAA at Suing Over Movie Downloads

Feeds

105363 items (97572 unread) in 19 feeds

Friends (1021 unread)

• 2 Star (84 unread)
• John Carrino (12 unread)
• Comments for Josh the Outspoken (296 unread)
• Josh (34 unread)
• Planet Matt (595 unread)

Build (68091 unread)

• MAKE Magazine (20292 unread)
• Instructables.com (35006 unread)
• Hack A Day (5017 unread)
• Toolmonger (7776 unread)

Heads (716 unread)

• Exploration Through Example
• Paul Graham: Unofficial RSS Feed (113 unread)
• Stevey's Blog Rants (34 unread)
• Joel on Software (207 unread)
• Gibson Blog (239 unread)
• Adventures in Bloggery (123 unread)

News (27537 unread)

• Slashdot (25203 unread)
• Economist.com Global Agenda (1412 unread)
• Ruby Inside (922 unread)

fun (207 unread)

• Templar, Arizona (207 unread)

Slashdot

• 

  How a Virginia Lawfirm Outpaces the MPAA at Suing Over Movie Downloads

  Posted: June 2nd, 2010, 9:55am MDT by timothy

  Jamie points out this Ars Technica piece on a series of suits brought by the Virginia law firm of Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver against users they accuse of illegally downloading movies. The firm has an interesting business model in these suits; sue enough users in a DC Federal court to be worth splitting the sum of many small settlement offers (generally $1,500-2,500 apiece) with the filmmakers, rather than rely on winning after trial a small number of larger judgments. Most people settle, and Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver has so far named more than 14,000 "Does" — as in John Doe — including, as mentioned a few days ago, 5,000 who downloaded The Hurt Locker.

  

  Read more of this story at Slashdot.