Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Feeds
105363 items (97572 unread) in 19 feeds
Friends
(1021 unread)
-
2 Star
(84 unread)
-
John Carrino
(12 unread)
-
Comments for Josh the Outspoken
(296 unread)
-
Josh (34 unread)
-
Planet Matt
(595 unread)
Build
(68091 unread)
-
MAKE Magazine
(20292 unread)
-
Instructables.com
(35006 unread)
-
Hack A Day
(5017 unread)
-
Toolmonger
(7776 unread)
Heads
(716 unread)
-
Exploration Through Example
-
Paul Graham: Unofficial RSS Feed (113 unread)
-
Stevey's Blog Rants
(34 unread)
-
Joel on Software (207 unread)
-
Gibson Blog
(239 unread)
-
Adventures in Bloggery (123 unread)
News
(27537 unread)
-
Slashdot (25203 unread)
-
Economist.com Global Agenda (1412 unread)
-
Ruby Inside
(922 unread)
fun
(207 unread)
-
Templar, Arizona
(207 unread)
Slashdot
-
Dueling Summary Judgment Motions In Viacom v. YouTube
Posted: March 22nd, 2010, 3:27am MDT by timothy
I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "Eric Goldman, an Associate Professor of Law at Santa Clara University School of Law, has an excellent analysis of the dueling summary judgment motions in Viacom v. YouTube. Basically, both sides have been trotting out the most damning things they can find and asking the judge to rule against the other party. Viacom is mad that Chad Hurley, one of YouTube's co-founders, lost his email archive and couldn't remember some old emails. Worse, YouTube founder Karim once uploaded infringing content. But then Google points out that only a very small percentage of the users are engaged in infringing activity (some 0.016% of all YouTube accounts have been deleted for infringement), one of the clips Viacom is suing over is only one second long (what about fair use?), and most of YouTube's content is non-infringing, including the campaign videos which all major US presidential candidates posted to YouTube." (More below.)