BuffaloFeeds » Slashdot » Subversives In South Carolina Mostly Safe

Feeds

105363 items (97572 unread) in 19 feeds

Friends (1021 unread)

• 2 Star (84 unread)
• John Carrino (12 unread)
• Comments for Josh the Outspoken (296 unread)
• Josh (34 unread)
• Planet Matt (595 unread)

Build (68091 unread)

• MAKE Magazine (20292 unread)
• Instructables.com (35006 unread)
• Hack A Day (5017 unread)
• Toolmonger (7776 unread)

Heads (716 unread)

• Exploration Through Example
• Paul Graham: Unofficial RSS Feed (113 unread)
• Stevey's Blog Rants (34 unread)
• Joel on Software (207 unread)
• Gibson Blog (239 unread)
• Adventures in Bloggery (123 unread)

News (27537 unread)

• Slashdot (25203 unread)
• Economist.com Global Agenda (1412 unread)
• Ruby Inside (922 unread)

fun (207 unread)

• Templar, Arizona (207 unread)

Slashdot

• 

  Subversives In South Carolina Mostly Safe

  Posted: February 15th, 2010, 5:41pm MST by kdawson

  sabt-pestnu sends in an update on our story about South Carolina and subversives. "According to Eugene Volokh, the Raw Story article has got it backwards. Westlaw says that the cited statute dates back to 1951, when a lot of anti-Communist statutes were being enacted nationwide. What brought Raw Story's attention to it may be that South Carolina is once again trying to repeal the archaic law. And in any event, a half-century-old case (Yates vs. United States, 354 U.S. 298 (1957)) took most of the teeth out of such laws."

  

  Read more of this story at Slashdot.