105363 items (97572 unread) in 19 feeds
Friends
(1021 unread)
2 Star
(84 unread)
John Carrino
(12 unread)
Comments for Josh the Outspoken
(296 unread)
Planet Matt
(595 unread)
Build
(68091 unread)
MAKE Magazine
(20292 unread)
Instructables.com
(35006 unread)
Hack A Day
(5017 unread)
Toolmonger
(7776 unread)
Heads
(716 unread)
Exploration Through Example
Stevey's Blog Rants
(34 unread)
Gibson Blog
(239 unread)
Adventures in Bloggery
(123 unread)
News
(27537 unread)
Ruby Inside
(922 unread)
fun
(207 unread)
Templar, Arizona
(207 unread)
FYI - Opera 9 and Safari 3 have similiar level of support for SVG. Firefox 3.1 should have some level of support for declarative animations (SMIL) as should the next version of Safari (after 3.1). Opera has had SMIL and SVG support for years.
The only browser really not playing the SVG game at the moment is Internet Explorer.
P.S. I was worried that DojoX GFX would have dependencies on a lot of the other (huge) Dojo libraries, but it looks like the dependencies are very minimal. So, that’s another point in Dojo’s favor.
I haven’t tried out dojox.gfx yet - still working down my list of libraries to try. It looks pretty usable and mature. (Raphael on the other hand was first released last week, so it’s hard to say yet.)
My use case is pretty simple (just some black-and-white line drawing), so it probably won’t make that much difference which library I use. At that level, they all have the same features. If I chose Raphael it would probably be because it would be less intimidating to customize or debug the library myself. On the other hand with a more mature library I might not need to.
@Matt: how is Raphaël different than DojoX GFX? Just that it’s more minimalistic?